Definition proposal
According to the definition given in
appropriate-economics.org
:
Complementary Currency Systems are appropriately designed social and economic networks which encourage cooperation and reciprocation, self-reliance and mutual aid, local production, micro-small enterprise development, socio-economic solidarity and economic justice for the meeting of needs, cultural revitalization, socio-economic solidarity and rural reconstruction.
Complementary Currency Systems use a medium of exchange that circulates together with the national currency to support the local economy in a way that is socially just.
Complementary currencies differ from conventional
national currencies. They extend our transactional power and complete national currencies. They can harmonize or sometimes be seen as competing national currencies.
Complementary currencies are created to deal with issues that the conventional money (US$, Euro, Sterling Pound and JPY for instance) are hardly able to solve, such as concentration of wealth, undermonetization, sustainable development, local and regional autonomy, disaster zones and crisis situations, medium or long term economic cycles, specific systemic social issues.
Characteristics of complementary currencies
To avoid some of the evils that national currencies tend to have, alternative/complementary currencies are designed to be free from charging interest rate to users. Some are equipped, on the contrary, with
demurrage to give rise to some positive effects that ordinary currencies are almost incapable perform.
Discussion
Alternative vs complementary currencies
The expression
alternative may implicitly be associated with the "alternative" movements, and partly because to the implications others so often assume that we intend to replace the existing dominant model.
In both cases,
alternative and
complementary implicitly grant precedence to "real" money (
national currencies), as though it is some absolute or fundamental form and those forms are advocated to be somehow derivative and reactive.
We may recall that money is something that is not "real", but it buys things that are real. There are two forms of money - money that is supposed to have value in itself and money that is just an information of flow. From this perspective, conventional money - national legal tender - can be seen not as some dominant fundamental, but more as a degenerate medium necessary for enabling trade in collective pyramidal intelligence
? society.
In the forthcoming civilization of
CIWC and
global collective intelligence, virtual money, community currencies
?, etc, aren't in any way "alternative". They are the norm, and national money systems can be seen as archaic systems. See
http://www.openmoney.org/way/dif.html
and associated pages.
Links